Tuesday, April 24, 2018

5G Stuff: Network Slicing (Part 1)


As part of 5G System architecture, 3GPP has come up with another concept, from the networks or operators p.o.v, called Network slicing based on the Services or Features to be served in the whole PLMN. This concept looks similar to filtering the services based on the QoS profiles so far being used in 2G/3G/4G systems. This time a specific name being used. This allows operators virtually create networks to cater the different needs based on functionality, performance, specific users etc.

Functionality can be categorized as priority, charging, policy control, security and mobility.

Performance is related to latency, mobility,  availability, reliability, data rates etc.

Users are MPS (Multimedia Priority Service) users, Public safety, corporate customers, roamers, hosting an MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator)

From this concept, network slice may be defined as piece of network to service some set of services. Below diagram explain the rest of the concept easily. Based on this, some of the core network elements may be common to some slices and some may be specific to each slice. Network creates instances of the required elements for each slice in the core network.



As mentioned in my earlier post (5G Identifiers (SUPI, PEI, GUTI...), S-NSSAI, NSSAI, SST, SD etc are the terms being used to explain the Network slicing concept and how UE is addressed.  

An S-NSSAI is comprised of SST and SD (optional) fields. An SST can be standardised (no SD) or non-standardised (either standardised SSD + non-standardised SD or non-standardised SST + no SD). Non-standardised S-NSSAI shall not be used in other PLMNs.  

Below table shows the Standardised SST values in a way for establishing the global interoperability for slicing (which recalls me a familiar triangle which explains 5G use cases)



Slice/Service type
SST value
Characteristics.
eMBB

1
Slice suitable for the handling of 5G enhanced Mobile Broadband.
URLLC
2
Slice suitable for the handling of ultra- reliable low latency communications.
MIoT
3
Slice suitable for the handling of massive IoT.

During the initial access to the network, below NSSAIs are defined which is mentioned in one logical order (as I understood).

1. Configured S-NSSAINSSAI provisioned in the UE applicable to one or more PLMNs. 

2. Requested S-NSSAINSSAI provided by the UE to the Serving PLMN during registration. Here the serving AMF, Network slice (s), Network Slice instances (s) are selected. 5G RAN use this information in AS signaling until 5GC issues the Allowed S-NSSAI (see below). When the UE provides 5G-GUTI, RAN will NOT use this Requested S-NSSAI for routing.

3. Allowed S-NSSAI - NSSAI provided by the Serving PLMN during e.g. a Registration procedure, indicating the S-NSSAIs values the UE could use in the Serving PLMN for the current registration area. 5GC will inform RAN and issue this Id after successful registration and is responsible for selection of the Network Slice Instance. 

There can be at most 8 S-NSSAIs in Allowed and Requested NSSAIs sent in signaling messages between the UE and the network.

As per the operator need or plan one Network Slice Instance can provide one or more S-NSSAIs and one S-NSSAI can be mapped to one or more Network Slice Instances. 

Further, to look from the tracking areas p.o.v, multiple Network Slice Instances mapped to one S-NSSAI may be available in one or more tracking areas. In one tracking area case, the AMF instance which is serving the UE is common to one or more Network Slice Instances.

This slicing concept itself will require more details, which will be continued in my next blogs.

Sources: 
3GPP TS 23501, sec 5.15
3GPP TS 22261, sec 6.1

Friday, April 20, 2018

5G Stuff: NR SUL - Supplementary Uplink


To put in simple terms addition of another Uplink to the existing one. As  mentioned in my earlier posts about Sub6 and mmW that operating frequencies for 5G runs until 60 GHz. From the earlier literature, path loss increases with frequency which will cause the Uplink to be lost completely even when closer to the base stations. Hence, to increase the UL coverage another frequency in the lower bands is needed. From the FR1 operating bands table, n80 to n84 are supporting SUL. Based on some studies, as mentioned in 3GPP TR 37872, SUL bands may find their place in reality. Below are the band combos of SUL bands with the normal Bands.

SUL_Band n78_Band n80

SUL Band combination
NR Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
BS transmit / UE receive
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
SUL_n78-n80
n78
3300 MHz
3800 MHz
3300 MHz
3800 MHz
TDD
n80
1710 MHz
1785 MHz



SUL

SUL band combination


SUL Configuration
NR Band
Subcarrier spacing
[kHz]
5
MHz
10
MHz
15
MHz
20
MHz
[40
MHz]
50
MHz
[60
MHz]
80
MHz
100 MHz
SUL_n78A-n80A
n78
15

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes



30

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
60

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n80
15
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes






Supported bandwidths per SUL band combination


SUL_Band n79_Band n80

SUL Band combination
NR Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
BS transmit / UE receive
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
SUL_n79-n80
n79
4400 MHz
5000 MHz
4400 MHz
5000 MHz
TDD
n80
 1710 MHz
1785 MHz



SUL

SUL band combination

SUL Configuration
NR Band
Subcarrier spacing
[kHz]
5
MHz
10
MHz
15
MHz
20
MHz
25
MHz
30
MHz
40
MHz
50
MHz
60
MHz
80
MHz
100 MHz
SUL_n79A-n80A
n79
15






Yes
Yes



30






Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
60






Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n80
15
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes






Supported bandwidths per SUL band combination


SUL_Band n78_Band n84

SUL Band combination
NR Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
BS transmit / UE receive
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
SUL_n78-n84
n78
3300 MHz
3800 MHz
3300 MHz
3800 MHz
TDD
n84
 1920 MHz
1980 MHz
N/A
SUL

SUL band combination

SUL Configuration
NR Band
Subcarrier spacing
[kHz]
5
MHz
10
MHz
15
MHz
20
MHz
25
MHz
30
MHz
40
MHz
50
MHz
60
MHz
80
MHz
100 MHz
SUL_n78A-n84A
n78
15

Yes

Yes


Yes
Yes



30

Yes

Yes


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
60

Yes

Yes


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n84
15
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes








Supported bandwidths per SUL band combination



SUL_Band n78_Band n82

SUL Band combination
NR Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
BS transmit / UE receive
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
SUL_n78-n82
n78
3300 MHz
3800 MHz
3300 MHz
3800 MHz
TDD
n82
 832 MHz
862 MHz
N/A
SUL

SUL band combination

SUL Configuration
NR Band
Subcarrier spacing
[kHz]
5
MHz
10
MHz
15
MHz
20
MHz
25
MHz
30
MHz
40
MHz
50
MHz
60
MHz
80
MHz
100 MHz
SUL_n78A-n82A
n78
15

Yes

Yes


Yes
Yes



30

Yes

Yes


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
60

Yes

Yes


Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n82
15
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes








Supported bandwidths per SUL band combination

I assume further studies are in progress for other SUL bands which were not covered above and are these 5 SUL bands expected to work with all other TDD bands (n38/n41/n50/n51 and n77-79). It is my FFS to see why FDD bands are not taken here in SUL case. Stay tuned! 


5G Stuff: LAA and eLAA

LAA is in 3GPP SI and WI since 2013. Though it is not absolutely a 5G topic, it is expected to see improvements in LAA when 5G is rolled ...